Showing posts with label Russia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Russia. Show all posts

Friday, October 22, 2010

LFF 2010 Mini Reviews

SCHASTYE MOE
[MY JOY]
DIR: Sergei Loznitsa
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Guess what? The title’s ironic. For me it was ironic on two levels; not only is there absolutely no joy depicted in MY JOY, but I got very little joy from it. It starts off as little more than a series of vignettes, tenuously linked by the presence of a truck driver (Viktor Nemets). He has a run in with some corrupt traffic cops, he’s told a story by an old man, he walks through a town, he has a run in with three men who want to steal what he’s transporting. And then, about an hour in, he’s gone from the film, at which juncture the film flies off on several random tangents, mostly focused on a mute bearded man. It does slowly (very, very slowly) draw together the various strands, but by that point I was a long way past caring.

The problem really is that we never learn anything about any of these characters or their lives, the whole film is just a series of ugly events, and for that to have any meaning for me I really have to be able to care about the people to whom those events are happening, and that was never the case with these near mute ciphers.

The only vignette that I really engaged with was a brief episode in which the truck driver, stalled by a long traffic jam, meets a young prostitute touting for business. I thought I recognised the actress, and the end credits confirmed that she is Olga Shuvalova, who I last saw in the exceptional EVERYBODY DIES BUT ME. Shuvalova is so forceful, and at the same time so vulnerable, as this nameless girl that in just five minutes she’s more interesting than anything else in the film.

MY JOY does look very good, especially in a menacing nighttime scene in the middle of the film, but the punishingly slow pace and the utter lack of interest I had in the characters made that scant compensation in a film from which I would like to claim back all but about five minutes of my time.


DES FILLES EN NOIR
[YOUNG GIRLS IN BLACK]
DIR: Jean Paul Civeyrac
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
They’re known as Emos now, apparently. They were Goths when I was growing up, and there was probably some other name for them when you were a kid, but the one thing that hasn’t changed from generation to generation is that those kids who wore black, thought everything – including life – was crap and romanticised dead rock stars were really bloody annoying. On that level, I suppose, YOUNG GIRLS IN BLACK is just about an unqualified success. On all other levels, however…

The bulk of the film unfolds over a single day; the day on which friends Noemie (Elise Lhomeau) and Priscilla (Lea Tissier) have decided to enact a suicide pact together. I can’t really fault Lhomeau and Tissier’s performances, it’s just that the characters are so irritating, and their problems so prosaic, that you just want to slap a bit of sense into them and tell them both to grow up. The other problem is that the film is just so predictable. The minute any pact is mentioned it seems obvious how it is going to end, and end it does, sadly the film refuses to follow suit.

The last twenty of the mere 85 minutes that YOUNG GIRLS IN BLACK runs are barely explicable, the film is so obviously over, and yet it continues, introducing new characters and ever more clichéd and corny moments, before ending with a shot which is simultaneously cheap and pretentious (something of a feat, to be fair).

Ultimately, YOUNG GIRLS IN BLACK is a demonstration of the fact that while strong acting is always welcome in a movie, it can’t always rescue one that isn’t working.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

From the Archives

I've been writing film criticism for over a decade now, and I've built up an extensive archive of reviews, so I thought that I'd start sharing some of those reviews that I wrote in the past, but can still stand by. These are as written at the time, except where edits are needed to correct typing errors, or to remove a joke or reference that won't make sense in this context.


EVERYBODY DIES BUT ME
DIR: Valeria Gai-Germanika
CAST: Polina Filonenko, Agniya Kuznetsova, Olga Shuvalova


9th graders Katya (Filonenko), Zhanna (Kuznetsova) and Vika (Shuvalova) are excited to find out that their school will soon be holding a disco, their first. But the events of the week leading up to the dance will test their recent pact to remain friends “until we grow up”?

I’ve noticed a real difference between American and European teen movies. The US high school movie generally insists that the ugly duckling is actually a model in specs, that the girl with the shit boyfriend will chuck him and go off with the man of her dreams and that the school rebel really just needs to have their talent for painting/pottery/singing recognised in order to become a different, better, person. That wasn’t what my teenage years were like, nor were those of my friends. The darker breed of foreign teen movie, of which Everybody Dies But Me is a notably difficult example, gets closer to what seemed a fraught, often painful time.

The opening ten minutes of this very short film (whose credits roll at barely the seventy minute mark) instill a false sense of security, as the three friends hold an impromptu funeral for Zhanna’s cat, back each other up when teachers single them out at school, and make their pact to remain friends. It’s when they go home that it becomes clear that Everybody Dies But Me is not going to be an easy experience. From there it doesn’t get any easier.

It would be criminal to reveal what happens in the film from there, suffice to say that this is not a film for you if you’re easily upset. Everybody Dies But Me is, despite its unrelenting darkness, utterly compelling. Much of the credit for that must go to its director; Valeria Gai-Germanika is just 24 years old, and this is her first film, something that is never evident from her sure handed touch behind the camera, or the maturity with which she deals with the difficult subject matter. Where Gai-Germanika’s youth really pays dividends is in her handling of the young cast. You get the feeling that, because she’s not so far from her characters age herself, she’s got a real connection to the material that must have helped in the process.

The cast are, uniformly, extraordinary. Each of the leads has her moment in the sun, and each shines in every scene, but if anyone sneaks acting honours it is Agniya Kuznetsova who, as Katya, spends most of the film being abused in some way or another, but gives her character real dignity, which, along with the knowledge of what she’s going through, allows you to like Katya even at her worst. This is not to take anything away from Filonenko or Shuvalova though.

If there’s any real problem with the film it’s the dialogue’s occasional tendency to melodrama, but then, that’s teenagers for you. Emotions are heightened, the end of a week long relationship might feel like the end of the world and though it won’t be to all tastes the odd bit of melodrama actually makes the characters feel more real.

It takes quite a bit for a movie to really affect me anymore, but this one left me, after its desperately sad closing image, shaken and on the verge of tears. It’s not easy, but it is a must see.


LA CONFUSION DES GENRES
DIR: Ilan Duran Cohen
CAST: Pascal Greggory, Nathalie Richard, Julie Gayet,
Olivier Martinez, Cyrille Thouvenin



This extremely French drama of criss-crossing relationships gets most of its effectiveness from an accomplished and fearless cast. Pascal Greggory, who is fast becoming one of my favourite French actors, heads the cast as a bi-sexual lawyer who is married to the woman who is carrying his child (Richard), living with the brother (Thouvenin) of an ex-girlfriend, and attracted to both the client (Martinez) whose life sentence he is trying to have reduced and to the ex (Gayet) has him contact in order to beg her to visit him in jail.

Pascal Greggory gives each of these relationships a different feel, and makes Alain, who is a rather weak character, engaging and sympathetic. It’s an exposing film for Greggory, but he commits to each of the many love scenes with gusto, be they with men or women.

Julie Gayet, like Greggory, is someone I’ve seen relatively little of, but always been impressed by and her quiet work here doesn’t disappoint, in her you feel Babette’s desperation, her wish to escape both her ex Marc and her mundane life as a hairdresser. She’s especially outstanding in the film’s best scene, in which Babette visits Marc a second time, she’s entirely silent, but the devastation that is evident in her face is genuinely upsetting.

The rest of the cast are similarly excellent, but it is Babette, Alain and Marc’s story that is the most dramatic and when we spend time away from it the film feels like it is treading water, particularly in the not terribly interesting relationship between Alain and his much younger lover Christophe. The other B Stories are more interesting, and despite how many variations on the wedding scene we’ve seen in movies over the years Cohen does manage to come up with a fresh and funny one for Greggory and Richard.

Visually the film promises much with a beautifully shot and edited opening sequence which sees Greggory in bed, holding a conversation with a series of naked lovers, male and female, but thereafter it becomes rather more conventional, which is a shame because that sequence suggests that Cohen is an imaginative director. However even if the film is slightly unimaginative at a visual level Cohen certainly shows himself to be a capable director of actors, even drawing nice work from people in one or two scene parts (Greggory and Richard’s parents are particularly good value).

Sadly it all wraps up just a little too neatly, and that doesn’t quite ring true given the tangled web these characters weave, but still, La Confusion des Genres has much to recommend it and is well worth 90 minutes of your day.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

24FPS at LFF: Days 2 and 3

LIFE DURING WARTIME
DIR: Todd Solondz
CAST: Alison Janney, Shirley Henderson, Ciaran Hinds,
Christopher Marquette, Paul Reubens, Ally Sheedy



Nobody could accuse Todd Solondz, the provoc-auteur behind Welcome to the Dollhouse, Happiness and Palindromes of making easy films. Life During Wartime is no exception. A cold, caustic, challenging film, it will likely split audiences right down the middle.

Life During Wartime is a pseudo-sequel to Happiness, taking place 11 years on from the events of the first film it again follows the extended Jordan family, and the various people in their lives. The odd thing, and I’ve no idea if this was always what Solondz intended, or if it was a decision forced on him by circumstance, is that though the characters are the same the entire cast has changed. It’s quite distracting at times - more so with some characters than others - the performances aren’t the problem as much as the fact that the old cast is near constantly at the back of your mind. If you can shake off the spectre of Happiness, a very strong film begins to emerge in Life During Wartime.

The main thrust of the story sees Joy (Henderson) is separated from her husband Allen (played by Philip Seymour Hoffman in Happiness and now, in a truly strange piece of casting, by Michael K. Williams of The Wire). Joy goes on a trip to visit her older sisters, first to Florida to see Trish (Janney), who is now dating a much older man (Michael Lerner), whom her young son greets with suspicion. Joy then finds herself in California visiting Helen (Sheedy), now a successful, Keanu Reeves dating, screenwriter. The whole time Joy is dogged by visions of long dead Andy (Reubens), who once took her on a disastrous date. Meanwhile, Trish’s ex-husband Bill (Hinds) is released from a 10-year prison sentence for molesting friends of his now college age son Billy (Marquette). There is, as you can see, a lot to keep track of, but Solondz’ screenplay manages to find enough time to give us full and developed portraits of all the characters, both old and new.

One issue with a lot of Solondz’ films is that his work can feel less like a complete film than a series of self-contained scenes, almost as if he were staging a series of beautifully designed one-act plays. That flaw is very much on display here, and yet I almost didn’t mind, because even though they don’t draw together entirely satisfactorily the individual pieces that make up the film are each so well formed that they work beautifully in and of themselves. This is perhaps best seen in the scenes featuring Charlotte Rampling (as an older woman who picks up Bill at a bar) and Ally Sheedy. They are both outstanding scenes. Rampling does her ice queen act to practiced perfection, and her withering “It was hard work, I’m old” is so cutting you almost expect Ciaran Hinds to bleed. Ally Sheedy, though, what a wonderful surprise. Just seeing Sheedy on screen now is rare enough, and that’s a terrible shame, because in her last two truly notable roles (this and High Art) she’s given searing, Oscar worthy work that just leaps off the screen at you. In just ten minutes Sheedy completely runs away with the film. She’s bitchy, hurtful, awful and absolutely hilarious, especially in her repeated references to Keanu. Those scenes are just brilliant, as good as any I’ve seen recently, and yet the movie would essentially be the same without them. There are many scenes like that in Life During Wartime.


Most integral to the film are Alison Janney as Trish and Shirley Henderson as Joy. It’s great to see these actresses get a proper showcase, both do consistently outstanding work in supporting roles, and here prove just as effective in leading parts. Janney, to her immense credit, is probably the only cast member (besides Ally Sheedy) who makes you completely forget the actor who previously played her part. She’s got some challenging scenes and, early on, some of the least realistic of Solondz’ always somewhat awkward dialogue. The fact that she can make the scene where Trish tells her 12 year old son (Dylan Riley Snyder) that she’s in love with the man she’s just been on her first date with (among other, much more inappropriate, things) play as naturally as it does is proof that she can do just about anything on screen. Henderson doesn’t entirely banish the spectre of the outstanding Jane Adams, but she does bring her own interpretation to Joy, and is very effective. Henderson’s mousy quality, both in her looks and her tiny high-pitched voice, works extremely well for a character who spends her life being buffeted between and manipulated by other people.

There are some deeply uncomfortable moments in Life During Wartime, and this being Todd Solondz, they are drawn out over as long a period as possible, in order to make us laugh and squirm in pretty much equal measure. There are times – as in a dinner scene when Trish, her much older boyfriend Harvey (Michael Lerner) and their respective sons get together for the first time, and the desperately sad scene between Bill and Billy – when you almost feel like you want to get away from the film, so uncomfortable is it. These, though, are among Life During Wartime’s best, and in the case of that dinner scene, funniest, moments. The cast is large, but they all do strong work. The only real problems for me were Paul Reubens, whose performance as Andy seemed simply to be a Jon Lovitz impression and Ciaran Hinds. I can’t take anything away from Hinds, he’s very good in the film, but he’s just so far from Dylan Baker’s performance that I couldn’t connect the character in Happiness with the character in Life During Wartime.

At times, like all of Solondz’ films, Life During Wartime dwells in ugliness. There’s little explicit here (brief topless shots of Rampling and Janney are as upfront as the film gets in that respect) but like Happiness this is a film about the evil people do to one another, about psychic violence (literally, in the case of Joy and Andy’s conversations). More than that, Life During Wartime is about the consequences of people’s actions, the way that what Bill did destroyed his family so completely that his younger children have been told that he is dead, the way that Andy tries to make Joy guilty for his suicide, and so on. Yet as it dwells in this ugliness, the film is quite beautiful to look at. Solondz and cinematographer Ed Lachman give it a highly designed, slightly unreal, look. It’s a very formal looking film, at times almost stagey, but always striking.

To be honest, reviewing a Todd Solondz film is almost a useless exercise, if you’ve seen any of his films before chances are you know what you’ll think of this. You either loved or hated the last one you saw, and Life During Wartime won’t change your mind. If you are new to his work, then this is as good a starting point as any, you won’t bring the baggage of Happiness to it and you can be sure of several outstanding performances and a beautifully shot movie. You can also be sure of seeing something that you aren’t going to feel ambivalent about, that in itself ought to be reason enough to catch this film.


Морфий
[MORPHIA]
DIR: Aleksey Balabanov
CAST: Leonid Bichevin, Ingeborga Dapkunaite, Andrei Panin


Apparently heroin is bad. Really bad.

Morphia is based on a series of semi-autobiographical short stories by Mikhail Bulgakov. The film is set in Russia, during the winter of 1917, and tells the story of Dr Polyakov (Bichevin), a young surgeon who arrives at a remote hospital which has had to endure several months with just a paramedic (Aleksandr Mosin) and two nurses (Dapkunaite and Svetlana Pismichenko) to sustain it. Polyakov is talented and well liked (especially by Dapkunaite’s nurse Anna), but after a vaccination leaves him in pain he begins to develop an addiction to the morphine that Anna administers. As time goes on he sinks deeper into addiction, and begins to take Anna with him.

Morphia is a technically excellent film. You can’t fault Aleksey Balabanov’s shot selection, the period detail is brilliant, the lighting is stunning, and always realistic to the fact that the locations of the time seldom have electricity, and the production design team simply out do themselves. Special mention must also go to the effects make up artist, whose work makes the many scenes of operations - especially one horrific amputation - so hideously close to reality that you can almost smell it.

Another laudable aspect of the film is its acting. This is what drew me to the film in the first place. Ingeborga Dapkunatte, a Lithuanian born actress, has been living in London and working in the UK for some years now. She’s one of those actresses that you are likely to recognise, she does a lot of small parts on television, and always impresses, but she seems to have struggled to find big roles here and I thought it would be interesting to see her in a large part in her native language. Dapkunaite doesn’t disappoint. She’s a warm and charming presence as nurse Anna, but also brings solid dramatic weight to all her scenes. She sometimes disappears for long stretches of screentime, and when that happens the film misses her.


Alexsandr Mosin is perhaps even better, he gives a nicely layered portrait of Vlas the paramedic, making us believe that this is a man who has seen just about everything, and yet is still able to greet it with a little black humour and a degree of optimism, along with Dapkunaite he’s a chink of light in an otherwise dark film. Leonid Bichevin looks a little young for the lead, but then Polyakov is supposed to be relatively newly qualified, it can be a little distracting though that he sometimes looks to be in his very early 20’s. However, Bichevin is a solid actor, and he takes you along on Poyakov’s dark journey.

With all this quality on display, it is a shame to say that it often feels like it is allowed to go to waste by the script and by the construction of the film. A major issue is that Balabanov seems to feel the need to acknowledge with his structure the fact that the film is based on short stories, and so we get innumerable title cards breaking up the narrative. Winter. The First Injection. First Amputation (an odd one, given that the film features only one amputation). They come up with irritating regularity, some segments last less than two minutes, and every single time a new card came up I felt jolted out of the film. It is as if Balabanov wants to remind us that we’re watching a movie, I can’t imagine to what purpose.

Perhaps the biggest problem with Morphia is the simplest. I really didn’t care. The script never gives Polyakov enough depth to make him truly compelling and, good though Bichevin is, that meant that I never really cared what happened with his morphine addiction. I was far more interested in Anna and in Vlas the paramedic, and would much rather have seen what happened with them at the hospital rather than follow Polyakov into his addiction treatment. The film’s ending should have left me shocked and shaken, but instead it left me feeling, so what? This is a shame, because there are enough good things in Morphia (especially Ingeborga Dapkunaite’s performance) to make it worth seeing, but it’s hard to recommend a film that wants to be hard hitting but ends up so easy to shrug off.